Donald Trump Junior (and Trump family) indirectly, through x structures, holds xx% in Greenland Energy - $GLND on NASDAQ.

Internal information coming from within the Trump family circle indicates that as of today, Donald Trump Junior indirectly, through x intermediary structures, holds xx% in Greenland Energy ($GLND on NASDAQ).

Ken Griffin and other members of the circle around Trump Junior want to buy the entire company, take it private, and sell it to an oil supermajor.

________

If what Robert Price is saying were true, it would have definitely attracted companies that actually understand the industry. How come dozens of larger firms didn't fight for that license instead of some company like 80 Mile?

________

This question hits the nail on the head and uncovers the biggest secret and risk of the entire Greenland project. If there are truly 13 billion barrels of oil there, why aren't ExxonMobil, Shell, or Chevron standing in line?

The reason why a small company like 80 Mile PLC secured the license, and not the oil giants, is not because the big players were unaware of the geological potential of the Jameson Land basin. Big oil companies were actually there in the past, and 80 Mile holds the license due to a combination of three crucial factors.


1. Big companies fled Greenland due to politics and ESG

Large multinational corporations invested heavily in this area in the past. In the 1980s and 1990s, detailed exploration was conducted by ARCO (Atlantic Richfield Company) along with the French company Total. That is precisely where the seismic data Robert Price talks about comes from.

However, everything changed fundamentally in 2021. That year, the left-wing and ecologically oriented Inuit Ataqatigiid (IA) party won the elections in Greenland and immediately declared an **official ban on new oil and gas exploration** across the entire territory of Greenland. Government officials stated at the time that the future belongs to climate protection, not oil.

For large multinational corporations (Exxon, Shell, BP), which are under immense pressure from Western governments, banks, and green investors (so-called ESG criteria), Greenland became "toxic" territory overnight. These companies simply could not afford to risk a massive wave of boycotts and lawsuits for wanting to drill for oil in the melting Arctic. Consequently, they completely withdrew their personnel from Greenland and abandoned the Jameson Land license.


2. The legal loophole that 80 Mile utilized

How is it possible then that 80 Mile PLC holds the license at all when the ban is in place? The British firm 80 Mile (then still under the name Bluejay Mining) managed to acquire the license **before this 2021 ban took effect**.

Greenland's legislation has one fundamental rule: the ban does not apply retroactively to projects where licenses had already been legally granted and investors were fulfilling their obligations. 80 Mile thus holds an exclusive exemption – they have in their hands one of the last legal oil exploration permits in all of Greenland, which is valid until 2027 with an option for an extension. Big companies can no longer legally obtain a new license, even if they wanted to.


3. A shift in the geopolitical game: Oil as a strategic asset

However, the situation has evolved dramatically in recent years. Larry Swets and Robert Price openly admit in interviews that their project has strong political backing from the United States. Washington views Greenland as a critical security zone. In a situation where the global energy market is extremely strained and geopolitical blocs are closing up, American interest in Greenlandic resources has rapidly increased.

Projects of this type are initially too risky for big oil companies from a PR (public relations) perspective. Big players, therefore, often choose a strategy of leaving the "dirty and risky work" to small, aggressive firms like 80 Mile and $GLND. 

If Halliburton actually proves during the autumn drilling that oil flows in the Jameson Land basin and the project is commercially viable, the situation will change instantly. 



➕➕👇👇

https://selectionnewyork.blogspot.com/2026/04/glnd.html


Popular posts from this blog

$GLND is a hidden atomic bomb. The discovery of oil in Greenland will change the world.

Image
$GLND Greenland Energy   The new "Arctic Permian" is the trade of a lifetime. There is oil in the USA. There is oil in Canada. There is oil in the North Sea. There is oil in Norway. And as for Greenland, there wouldn't be any? Who actually believes that? Do not use a stop loss, they will try to shake you out of the stock!! Stop staring at the short-term manipulation and look at the math!  The recent $70M raise with Halliburton is NOT a dilution death spiral—it’s the launchpad . We are officially FUNDED for drill (OPW-1). Halliburton doesn’t sign "Integrated Logistics" contracts for dry holes. They know what’s in Jameson Land.  The Math of a Giant: Target: 13 BILLION Barrels (Prospective). Ownership: $GLND controls the whole basin. The Exit: If we prove even 10% of that, we aren't looking at $5 or $10. We are looking at a massive M&A buyout from Exxon/Chevron in the $100+ range .  Target: 13 BILLION Barrels = $1000+ / share. The weak hands are fol...
Read more

Robert Price, Ken Griffin and Greenland Energy $GLND 2026.

Image
An Insider’s Look at Greenland Energy ($GLND): Why the August-to-October Timeline and the Deep-Freeze Strategy are Key to the Jameson Land Discovery. Retail investors are often spooked by small daily fluctuations, but smart money operates on a completely different wavelength. When looking at Greenland Energy ($GLND) and their highly anticipated drilling campaign in Jameson Land, Greenland, many commentators confuse the operational milestones. Specifically, the mention of October and the "freeze-up period" by CEO Robert Price in recent interviews has caused some confusion. To fully understand why elite forces like Ken Griffin’s Citadel Advisors (holding a 9.3% stake) and President Larry Swets Jr. are aggressively accumulating shares right now, one must understand the unique laws of Arctic engineering. The August and October timelines are not contradictory; they are two sides of the same coin. 1. The August Window: The Critical Logistics and Maritime Sprint In the Arctic, mothe...
Read more